The Journal
Essays
Long-form writing on AI, philosophy, psychology, and systems thinking.
-
The Stoic Programmer: Marcus Aurelius on Technical Leadership
Marcus Aurelius governed 70 million people during plague and war. His Stoic principles map directly to engineering leadership: focus on what you control, judge actions not outcomes, serve those you lead.
-
The first principles of system design: What software architecture can learn from philosophy
-
Designing for Graceful Degradation in Uncertain Environments
Systems designed for graceful degradation recovered user-facing functionality 8.4 times faster during major cloud outages than all-or-nothing systems. Degradation is honest architecture.
-
The architecture of meaning: How the tools we build shape what we think is possible
-
Tillich’s Ultimate Concern and the Idol of Productivity
Paul Tillich defined idolatry as elevating a finite thing to ultimate significance. When 61% of technology workers measure self-worth by productivity, productivity has become the industry's idol.
-
Ethics of AI-Assisted Decision Making in Government
Six government AI systems reviewed, none meeting transparency standards required of equivalent human processes. Public systems demand higher ethical standards, yet the opposite is often true.
-
The Absurdity of Optimizing Deprecated Systems
The average enterprise system lives 6.2 years before deprecation. Camus's absurdism reveals that meaning in engineering comes not from permanence but from the quality of the work itself.
-
Data Privacy Engineering Is a Data Engineering Discipline
Implementing tokenization and differential privacy at the pipeline level reduced PII exposure incidents by 89% while adding less than 3% to processing time.
-
The Ethics of AI Art Is a Labor Economics Problem
An estimated 26% of commercial illustration work has been displaced by AI image generation since 2023, with losses concentrated among early-career artists. This is a labor economics problem, not a copyright debate.
-
The Difference Between Data and Evidence
In a review of 30 data-driven proposals, 22 presented data as evidence without the analytical chain from observation to inference. The gap is analytical rigor.